Canadian Policing Research Catalogue

Police officers' decision making and discretion : forming suspicion and making a stop : a report to the National Institute of Justice / Geoffrey P. Alpert, Roger G. Dunham, Meghan Stroshine, Katherine Bennett, John MacDonald.

This page has been archived on the Web

Information identified as archived is provided for reference, research or recordkeeping purposes. It is not subject to the Government of Canada Web Standards and has not been altered or updated since it was archived. Please contact us to request a format other than those available.

Location

Canadian Policing Research

Resource

e-Books

Authors

Publishers

Bibliography

Includes bibliographical references.

Description

1 online resource (151 pages)

Note

Author(s) affiliated with: Geoffrey P. Alpert - University of South Carolina; Roger G. Dunham - University of Miami; Meghan Stroshine - Marquette University; Katherine Bennett - Armstrong Atlantic State University; John MacDonald - RAND.

Summary

Most police activity occurs in private, away from the public's view. This creates a situation that allows police officers discretion in the way they think about what they see and how they handle those with whom they come in contact. There has been an effort by the research community to examine issues concerning how police act and respond in general and what police do specifically when they interact with citizens. A conspicuous void in the research effort has been the lack of attention paid to the process by which police officers form suspicion about a suspect whether or not a formal intervention such as a stop was made. Officers in Savannah, Georgia were observed and debriefed after they became suspicious about an individual or vehicle. Observers accompanied officers on 132, 8-hour shifts, during which time, the officers formed suspicion 174 times. AForming suspicion@ occurred any time an officer became doubting, distrustful or otherwise troubled or concerned about an individual. In most of the cases, it was the behavior of the suspect(s) that concerned the officer. This concern did not always result in a stop of an individual or vehicle. In some cases, the officers realized that their initial Asuspicion@ was unsupported. In fact, 103 stops resulted from the suspicions that were formed by the officers during the times they were observed. Several factors were significantly associated with the likelihood that an officer would make a stop based on suspicion. Interestingly, none of the characteristics of the suspect was important. In other words, officers were equally likely to stop individuals whether they were male or female, African-American or white, low or high socioeconomic status. The encounters were assessed by the interactions between the officers and suspects. Although most encounters went smoothly, some changed character based on the actions and attitudes of one or both of the actors.

Subject

Online Access

Date modified: