Canadian Policing Research Catalogue

Evaluation of the TASER eXtended Range Electronic Projectile (XREP) / Donald Sherman, Cynthia Bir.

This page has been archived on the Web

Information identified as archived is provided for reference, research or recordkeeping purposes. It is not subject to the Government of Canada Web Standards and has not been altered or updated since it was archived. Please contact us to request a format other than those available.

Location

Canadian Policing Research

Resource

e-Books

Authors

Bibliography

Includes bibliographical references (pages 63-64).

Description

1 online resource (xii, 160 pages)

Note

"DRDC CSS CR 2012-003."
"March 2012."
"PWGSC Contract Number: W7711-09816/001/SS."
"Contractor's Document Number: 2012 XREP 04F."
Authors affiliated with: Wayne State University.
"This project was sponsored Canadian Police Research Centre."

Summary

The TASER XREP was assessed to provide a complete characterization as a less-lethal weapon. The characterization was undertaken to determine how the system performed under normal and special conditions. The characterization included an assessment of the physical/electrical design and durability of the system, in-flight aerodynamics and accuracy, risk of blunt and penetrating injuries as well as a physiological surrogate. Testing was performed in a laboratory setting to allow for control of environmental variables. All fired rounds were tested with a computer-controlled firing system. The overall accuracy of the projectile was found to decrease with distance. Vertical drop from the point of aim to the point of impact at a distance of 20 meters was -51.37 ± 4.79 cm when tested at 23°C. Testing at 50°C and -20°C showed significantly less vertical drop -31.90 ± 3.12 cm and -29.69 ± 10.23 cm respectively. The round was stable in flight and produced a very low risk of blunt trauma although penetration testing at 2 meters showed a high likelihood of penetration. The electrical output of the projectile was within the manufacturer’s specification, continued to operate after impact and did not produce any persistent clinically significant effects in the swine model.

Subject

Online Access

Date modified: