Library Catalogue

My Cart

RCMP use of the Conducted Energy Weapon (CEW) : January 1, 2009 to December 31, 2009 : special report.

This page has been archived on the Web

Information identified as archived is provided for reference, research or recordkeeping purposes. It is not subject to the Government of Canada Web Standards and has not been altered or updated since it was archived. Please contact us to request a format other than those available.

Location

Canadian Policing Research

Resource

e-Books

Alternate Title

Utilisation de l’arme à impulsions (AI) à la GRC du 1er janvier au 31 décembre 2009 : rapport spécial.

Authors

Publishers

Description

1 online resource (82 pages) : charts

Note

Cover title.
"June 24, 2010"--Cover.
Issued also in French under title: Utilisation de l’arme à impulsions (AI) à la GRC du 1er janvier au 31 décembre 2009 : rapport spécial.

Summary

"This report represents the continued work of the Commission to oversee the RCMP’s use of the CEW and to hold the Force accountable to the public for that use. The use of this weapon, as well as the related policies and training, continue to evolve and the Commission is pleased to be working with the RCMP to ensure that members are properly trained and that the CEW is utilized and monitored effectively and within the parameters of policy. Next year we look forward to reporting on the SB/OR database."--Conclusion.

Subject

Online Access

Contents

Overview of analysis of CEW database -- Section 1. -- 1.1 Descriptive analyses -- 1.1.1. Member operating CEW -- 1.1.2. Subject characteristics -- 1.1.3. Injury and medical characteristics -- 1.1.4. CEW deployment characteristics -- 1.1.5. Cartridge usage characteristics -- 1.2. Bivariate analyses -- 1.2.1. CEW deployment -- 1.2.2. Medical examination -- Section 2. -- Narrative summaries -- 2.1. Descriptive circumstantial categories -- 2.2. Bivariate analyses -- Section 3. At-risk populations -- 3.1. Youths aged 13-17 -- 3.2. Mental health/suicide -- Section 4. The Northern Divisions -- Section 5. Members with multiple reports -- Section 6. Report comparisons -- 6.1. Comparing 2009 to 2008 -- 6.2. Annual comparisons: 2002-2009 -- Conclusion -- Appendix 1. Glossary -- Appendix 2. Divisional CEW use.

Date modified: